|
Post by surroundx on Nov 16, 2013 13:43:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Melanie on Nov 16, 2013 14:24:35 GMT
The question is whether the South Island form is a distinct subspecies.
|
|
|
Post by surroundx on Nov 17, 2013 1:04:00 GMT
The question is whether the South Island form is a distinct subspecies. Southey and Mitchmough (2000) found that birds from the North Island were closer to those from the Chatham Islands, with birds from the south of the South Island being an outgroup (i.e. a separate taxon). The single known preserved specimen from the north of the South Island is different again, though whether it is typical of birds from that location is not know given the miniscule sample size. Southey, I. and Hitchmough, R. (2000). Morphological variation in New Zealand brown teal (Anas chlorotis). Conservation Advisory Science Notes No. 325, Department of Conservation, Wellington.
|
|
|
Post by Sebbe on Mar 9, 2017 20:51:37 GMT
There is actually a name available for the South Island population. It was described as Elasmonetta chlorotis peculiaris by Mathews (1937) from Lake Wakatipu. Valid name today would be Anas chlorotis peculiaris This species is however considered to be Monotypic by most relevant authorities including Gill et al. (2010; Checklist of the birds of New Zealand and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica 4th Edition), HMW4, HBW/Birdlife, IOC and Clements.
|
|
|
Post by surroundx on Jan 27, 2018 11:20:56 GMT
|
|