peej
Junior Member
Posts: 21
|
Post by peej on Mar 29, 2005 23:51:20 GMT
Does any one happen to have an image of this animal and information about it's past.
|
|
|
Post by Melly on Mar 30, 2005 8:22:45 GMT
The Raccoon (Procyon gloveralleni), was introduced into Barbados around 1,000 years ago by Lokono-Arawak Indians who kept them as pets. Sadly, this species is now feared extinct as the last one captured was in 1964; in the Hackleton's cliff area of the parish of St. John. The Barbados Museum is the only place where a stuffed specimen of this wonderful animal can still be seen. The Barbados raccoon, like the other four island raccons, are debated as to whether they are actually separate species, legitimate subspecies of Procyon lotor, or just introduced deviations of P. lotor. The IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid and Procyonid Specialist Group keep them as separate species since there is much unknown about the species. I don't know if there is any photograph of a living raccoon but there is a short desription in the book "Raccoons and their relatives" by Dr. David Stone. Here is another interesting article about the raccoons on the West Indies www.nmnh.si.edu/vert/mammals/pdf/dew2.pdf
|
|
Shadow
Junior Member
Posts: 25
|
Post by Shadow on Apr 5, 2005 14:30:36 GMT
What for informations we have about this species? How big was them? What eated them? What was the differences between lotor and gloveralleni?
|
|
|
Post by Melly on Apr 5, 2005 14:36:23 GMT
This is all what i have found so far:
A number of authors dispute whether the island forms of raccoon and coati are species, subspecies, or recently reintroduced forms. MacPhee and Flemming (1999) consider P. gloveralleni to be extant as P. lotor. However, the IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid and Procyonid Specialist Group maintain that the taxonomic uncertainties around this taxon have not yet been fully resolved (Glatston, pers. comm.). The species is thought formerly to have been restricted to Barbados (Glatston 1994) and the last living specimen was seen in 1964 (Lazell 1972).
|
|
Shadow
Junior Member
Posts: 25
|
Post by Shadow on Apr 5, 2005 14:57:30 GMT
Ok.thank you.
|
|
|
Post by sebbe67 on Sept 2, 2005 18:02:18 GMT
Barbados Raccoon (/? gloveralleni) This species was formerly confined to Barbados. However, the last living specimen was seen in 1964, and this species is now believed to be extinct. This species is now believed to be extinct. A pair of common raccoons has been established in former Bahaman raccoon habitat.
|
|
|
Post by sebbe67 on Oct 1, 2005 14:51:57 GMT
The type material of P. gloveralleni is a juvenile male skin and skull (MCZ 18951). Nelson & Goldman (1930) wrote that ‘such scanty material affords an unsatisfactory basis for a new species’; this did not, however, discourage them from naming one. They correctly observed that ‘the general form of the skull . . . shows alliance to other West Indian and Florida raccoons, rather than to those of the Middle [=Central] American mainland’ (Nelson & Goldman, 1930: 454). Despite this, Goldman (1950) and Hall (1981) suggested a possible relationship between raccoons from Central America and Barbados. One of the most distinctive features of the holotype of gloveralleni as described by Nelson & Goldman (1930: 454) is the absence of first premolars in every quadrant of the jaw; they also noted that ‘the crown of the upper carnassial [is] longer than broad, a condition unusual [in raccoons]’. Two unsexed adult specimens from Barbados, collected in c. 1867, were discovered on display at USNM after gloveralleni was described (Appendix). The skins of these specimens are badly preserved, but both skulls are largely intact. None of the unusual traits of the young holotype characterize these specimens, each of which has anterior premolars present in both jaws. Goldman’s (1950) measurements for the upper fourth premolars of these specimens demonstrate that length and breadth of this tooth are roughly equal for both. While the occiput and zygomatic arches of USNM 267380 are damaged, the skull of USNM 267381 is almost fully intact. The large postorbital processes of this latter specimen approach the size of those seen in some Central American representatives of P. lotor, such as P. l. pumilus of Panama. However, its more moderate dentition, inflated auditory bullae, posteriorly deflected postorbital processes, and hooklike coronoid process of the mandible suggest an affinity with the raccoons of Georgia and Florida rather than Central America, in line with Nelson & Goldman’s (1930) initial observations. Lack of first premolars is an abnormality observed elsewhere only in raccoons from coastal Georgia (Goldman, 1950), and we suggest the Florida/Georgia region as a probable point of origin for the raccoon population formerly present on Barbados. Lazell (1981), who examined one additional skull of gloveralleni (in a museum on Barbados), arrived at a similar conclusion.
|
|
david
Full Member
Posts: 419
|
Post by david on Oct 2, 2005 18:09:02 GMT
I don't thimk it is right to designate a new title to an introduced species. They should not have been there in the first place. If the frey squirrel of Britain changed slightly and was called a new species in thousands of to come, I would turn in my grave at the thought. And if it later came extinct and people attually were upset at the thought I think i'd shed a tear where ever i be. I say good ridence.
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Oct 3, 2005 10:11:07 GMT
The American-European Bison hybrids in the Caucasian mountains are now also seen as a new subspecies. In 2000, these hybrids have been formally described as a new subspecies of European bison Bison bonanus montanus Rautian, Kalabushkin et Nemtsev, 2000 and included in the Red Data Book of Republic Adygea (part of the Russian Federation) and protected as a species in the reserve.
I agree that this kind of naming new subspecies is not favourable in my opinion. However, it is normal for species to colonise islands and to change! This animal did it not on their own, but was introduced into Barbados around 1,000 years ago by Lokono-Arawak Indians. So you could say it is an invasive alien species.
This is the same as with the Dingo. Where do you draw the line. Are all human introductions bad, or is it part of a new 'natural' way of colonising? Is there a difference if they are harmful to other species or not? And is it different when they are introduced more than 1000 years ago or just recently? Are more (extinct) animals than invasives, like for example the Falkland Islands Fox/Wolf? They were most likely also introduced by humans long ago. Questions that are good to think about.
|
|
|
Post by another specialist on Oct 20, 2005 0:02:20 GMT
I agree were you begin and were do you end it - this will be a discussion that could go on and on with no conclusion
|
|
|
Post by sebbe67 on Aug 15, 2006 12:32:13 GMT
MCZ 18591, holotype of P. gloveralleni, skin and skull, juvenile male, no specific locality, collected 1920. USNM 267380, skin and skull, unsexed adult, no specific locality, no other information. USNM 267381, skin and skull, unsexed adult, no specific locality, no other information.
Taxonomic status and conservation relevance of the raccoons (Procyon spp.) of the West Indies
|
|
|
Post by another specialist on Aug 15, 2006 20:16:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Bhagatí on Oct 2, 2006 19:50:08 GMT
I not found picture of barbados raccoon. Ist maybe or possible species is (Procyon brachyurus) Wiegmann's raccoon. Wrote in internet page www.nmnh.si.edu/vert/mammals/pdf/dew2.pdfThis species (Procyon brachyurus) is similar with Procyon minor & Procyon maynardi & Procyon gloveralleni too. But Procyon minor is live, Procyon maynardi not know, Procyon gloveralleni is extinct. Procyon minor is existing picture very well, ist not this species. Procyon maynardi very light. But Procyon gloveralleni is very dark. I sending this species Procyon brachyurus in here.
|
|
|
Post by Bhagatí on Oct 2, 2006 20:03:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Melanie on Oct 2, 2006 20:27:27 GMT
as far as i know there a dark specimens of P. lotor too. P. gloveralleni was first discovered and described in the 1920s
|
|
|
Post by Bhagatí on Oct 2, 2006 20:33:56 GMT
from planet-mammiferes.org/espece3.php?indice=42Barbados raccoon [ Raton de la Barbade ] More dark pelage as P. lotor LATIN NAME Procyon gloveralleni AUTHOR Nelson and Goldman, 1930 SYNONYMS NOTES DISTRIBUTION Known only from the type locality: Island of Barbados, Lesser Antilles, West Indies STATUS IUCN - Extinct Describ subspecies = ? ; Valid in taxonomy = ? Possible listed subspecies = 0 COMMON NAME Bahama raccoon (E) [ Raton des Bahamas ] LATIN NAME Procyon maynardi AUTHOR Bangs, 1898 SYNONYMS NOTES Koopman et al. (1957ref) examined the type series and believed it to be conspecific with P. lotor DISTRIBUTION Known only from the type locality: Nassau Island,Bahamas STATUS IUCN : En danger Describ subspecies = 0? ; Valid in taxonomy = 0? COMMON NAME Guadeloupe raccoon [ Raton de la Guadeloupe ] LATIN NAME Procyon minor AUTHOR Miller, 1911 SYNONYMS NOTES DISTRIBUTION Guadeloupe Isl (Lesser Antilles) STATUS IUCN : En danger Describ subspecies = 0? ; Valid in taxonomy = 0? Possible listed subspecies = 0
|
|
|
Post by Bhagatí on Oct 2, 2006 20:46:12 GMT
from dew2.pdf:
Table 1. Goldman’s (1950) classification of raccoons P. lotor Mainland North and Central America P. cancrivorus Mainland South and Central America P. pygmaeus Cozumel Island off eastern Mexico P. insularis Tres Marias Island (western Mexico) P. maynardi New Providence Island (Bahamas) P. minor Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles) P. gloveralleni Barbados (Lesser Antilles) of animal for a raccoon (see MacPhee & Fleagle, 1991), or perhaps his observations were actually made on Barbados, an island he visited on the same voyage. Raccoons were certainly present on Barbados as early as the late 17th century (R. Hall, 1764). However, Browne (1789) described the transport of pet raccoons to Jamaica, and it is not impossible that similarly transported raccoons had established a feral population by the time of Sloane’s visit. Whatever the origin or identity of Sloane’s ‘racoons’, there seem to be no raccoons on Jamaica today. In 1837, based on two specimens obtained from a menagerie in Louisiana, Wiegmann (1837) described a new species of raccoon he named Procyon brachyurus. Wiegmann’s raccoons supposedly originated from somewhere in the West Indies, and he hesitantly gave the type locality of brachyurus as ‘Antillae?’ The current whereabouts of these two specimens are unknown; they may not have been preserved. Hershkovitz (1966) discussed Wiegmann’s account, concluding that it could not be applied with certainty to any of the raccoons later described from theWest Indies. Procyon brachyurus has never been used as a scientific name since (but see E. R. Hall, 1981). The first raccoon from the West Indies to be formally described from a known locality was P. maynardi, from New Providence Island in the Bahamas (Bangs, 1898). Miller (1911) later named the raccoon population from Guadeloupe as a new species, P. minor. Both of these raccoons were said to differ from mainland P. lotor, chiefly in their smaller body size. By the time of Miller’s paper, description of insular raccoons as distinct species had become a taxonomic trend; in addition to Bangs’ P. maynardi, Merriam (1898, 1901) had described P. insularis from the Tres Marias off the western coast of Mexico and P. pygmaeus from Isla Cozumel, east of the Yucatan Peninsula. Nevertheless, Allen (1911) expressed scepticism about the taxonomic validity of the New Providence and Guadeloupe raccoons, writing: It is doubtful what significance may be attached to the recent discovery of a small race of raccoon in New Providence (Bahamas) and in Guadeloupe (Windward Islands). A third raccoon is known from Barbados, but its identity is uncertain. Some have supposed that the silent ‘dogs’ (‘perros mudos’) mentioned by the early Spanish explorers as kept by the natives of Haiti were really these raccoons, but such a possibility seems extremely remote. Feilden and others assume with some confidence that the raccoon on Barbados might readily have drifted thither from South America with some of the wreckage of trees and flotsam that is constantly borne to the windward shores of that island by the easterly currents of air and sea. On the other hand, it may have readily been introduced during the last one hundred years by the European invader. Although raccoons from Barbados had never been formally described, Allen (1911) and Feilden (1890) knew of their existence from historical accounts (Hughes, 1750; R. Hall, 1764; Schomburgk, 1848; Chester, 1869). Allen (1911) referred to the Barbados raccoon as ‘P. cancrivorus?’, assuming a potential South American origin. However, when Nelson & Goldman (1930) formally described Procyon gloveralleni from Barbados, they recognized its close relationship to North American P. lotor, not P. cancrivorus. The Barbados raccoon was last sighted in 1964 (Lazell, 1972), and is now generally regarded as extinct (Glatston, 1994). The presence (or former presence) of three supposedly distinct species of raccoon from widespread locations in theWest Indies (Fig. 1), all closely related to P. lotor, presents a biogeographic conundrum. The native Bahamian fauna includes only one other non-volant mammal, the hutia Geocapromys ingrahami. Guadeloupe and Barbados have no native non-volant mammals except for their supposedly endemic raccoons (Varona, 1974), although Barbados may have supported an undescribed rice rat Oryzomys in the recent past (Marsh, 1984). Excluding Amerindian dogs from Holocene deposits (Arredondo & Varona, 1974; MacPhee & Fleagle, 1991), mammalian carnivores have no deep presence in the Caribbean, either palaeontological or archaeological (Arredondo, 1976; Olson, 1978). Furthermore, the bat faunas of these islands are primarily derived from South America or the Greater Antilles rather than North America, where one must look for the insular raccoons’ affinities. This strange biogeography is a problem that has been recognized for some time. Goldman (1950: 31) wrote, ‘How the particularWest Indian islands now inhabited were reached by raccoons, and why these animals do not occur on many other islands of the archipelago where conditions seem similarly suitable are interesting subjects for speculation.’ In the Bahamas, raccoons are found today on Grand Bahama Island and New Providence Island. Although the New Providence population is considered a distinct species, that of Grand Bahama, known to have been introduced from Florida in 1932–33 (Sherman, 1954), is not. However, after a visit to the Bahamas in 1784, the German naturalist Johann Sch¨opf (Sch¨opf, in Morrison, 1911; McKinley, 1959) discussed the introduction of raccoons to New Providence as well, writing: Of wild quadrupeds, there are but two species, properly only one, indigenous to these islands. The Racoon is found only on Providence Island, of which it is no more originally a native than the rats and mice brought in by ships. From one or more tame pairs of these droll beasts, brought over by the curious from the main-land, and afterwards escaped by chance in the woods, the race has amazingly increased, to the great vexation and damage of the inhabitants, who can scarcely protect their housefowls from these stealthy thieves.
|
|
|
Post by another specialist on Oct 3, 2006 6:38:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Bhagatí on Jan 28, 2007 23:40:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by another specialist on Jan 29, 2007 7:04:05 GMT
Not really real illustrations but cartoon but better than nothing.
You can translate it roughly by using one of the free translators on the net like Altavista.
|
|