|
Post by Peter on Apr 26, 2006 17:55:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sebbe67 on Apr 26, 2006 21:32:10 GMT
looking forward to it
|
|
|
Post by another specialist on Apr 30, 2006 12:42:26 GMT
Can't wait to see what new
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2006 13:01:49 GMT
... only 5 days to wait ...
|
|
|
Post by Melanie on May 1, 2006 9:48:17 GMT
I am thrilled too. Times Online has written something about 40.000 species which are now regarded as threatened. If they have compiled all this species that would be more than twice as much than in the last list.
|
|
|
Post by Peter on May 2, 2006 17:39:33 GMT
The total number of species declared officially Extinct in the 2006 list is 784 and a further 65 are only found in captivity or cultivation.
|
|
|
Post by Melanie on May 2, 2006 17:41:54 GMT
This is the same number like in the 2004 list.
|
|
|
Post by Peter on May 2, 2006 17:45:53 GMT
For the extinctions it is, but 5 more are extinct in the wild. And subspecies are not included.
2004 List count: Extinct species: 784 Extinct subspecies: 47 Species extinct in the wild: 60 Subspecies extinct in the wild: 13
2006 List count: Extinct species: 784 Extinct subspecies: ? Species extinct in the wild: 65 Subspecies extinct in the wild: ?
|
|
|
Post by another specialist on May 3, 2006 8:59:09 GMT
if the figure of extinct is the same some must of been rediscovered so reclassified as some new extinctions are there for starters Alburnus akili current IUCN classes it as VU A2de ver 2.3 (1994) Year Assessed 1996 but the new IUCN 2006 its classed as extinct.
|
|
|
Post by another specialist on May 3, 2006 9:01:39 GMT
also Thick-billed Ground Dove, Gallicolumba salamonis 2004: Critically Endangered 2006: Extinct and Chondrostoma scodrense (fish) 1996: Vulnerable 2006: Extinct.
|
|
Ben
Junior Member
Posts: 16
|
Post by Ben on May 3, 2006 11:33:05 GMT
Does the Red List list rediscovered species?
|
|
|
Post by Melanie on May 3, 2006 12:05:11 GMT
"rediscovered" is no IUCN criteria term. But there are list certainly such species as most of them are endangered.
|
|
|
Post by sebbe67 on May 4, 2006 5:30:35 GMT
Its here, but seems one day before ;D
I have waited for this for months now, wonderful to see it.
|
|
|
Post by Peter on May 4, 2006 8:08:03 GMT
Indeed and now the work begins to update my site!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2006 8:29:03 GMT
Hi ! Do they only count 5 species as extinct ? Or did I something wrong with my search.
|
|
|
Post by Peter on May 4, 2006 8:31:44 GMT
Than you did indeed somthing wrong with your search, as the list contains 784 extinct species.
|
|
|
Post by Peter on May 4, 2006 8:33:30 GMT
I see you have selected "2006" during your search (in the "Red List Assessment Dates" box). These five are only the five extinctions that were assessed as extinct this year. You need to select "All" while searching, then you will search the whole red list.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2006 8:37:51 GMT
Oha, okay, I may try it again, Thank You ! Does it take so long to load by You as well ?
|
|
|
Post by sebbe67 on May 4, 2006 12:34:23 GMT
I have many problems with this site, it either take extremly long before a search is completed, but more often I get a error messege.
Maybe probelms with the site.
|
|
|
Post by Melanie on May 4, 2006 13:59:10 GMT
Me too. I have no problems to find a data record of a single species. But when i am trying to find all the data in a whole category (e.g. all mammals in the Category DD from 2006) the database isn't work properly. Perhaps there are too many accesses at the moment.
|
|