Ducula lakeba new species
(Fig. 7-10; Tables 7, 8)
ETYMOLOGY: The species is named after Lakeba, the island on which it was first found.
DIAGNOSIS: Tarsometatarsus longer than that of the biggest extant Ducula species, D. goliath,
and D. galeata. Proximal width is greater, and shaft length from the proximal end to the fossa
metatarsi I is relatively longer (relative to proximal width) than in D. david of Wallis Island
(Balouet & Olson 1987), the largest fossil species, yet its mid-shaft width is less than in D.
david (Table 7).
HOLOTYPE: A right tarsometatarsus, Fiji Museum, Archaeology Department, bone numbered
197-3-W-1-6, 6. Cast of type, MNZ S38899. For measurements see Table 7.
TYPE LOCALITY: Qara-ni-puqa Rockshelter (site 197), Lakeba Island, Fiji Group. Collected
by Simon Best et al. between December 1976 and September 1977.
PARATYPES: Fiji Museum Archaeology Department, 18 specimens: [Format: "element, number
on bone;" where 197 is "site 197", the following digit (1 or 3) refers to the excavated square,
and the letter (w or v) refers to the layer the specimen was derived from] pR tmt, 197.1.W.2,
11; pL tmt, 197.3.W.1.4, 3; sL tmt, 197.1.W.2, 23; dR tmt, 197.3.W.1, 1 (NW baulk); s+dL
tmt, 197.3.W.1.8, 5; pR tmt, 197.3.W.1.3,47; sLtmt, 197.3.W.1, 2; sL tmt, 197.1.W.2, 10; sL
tmt, 197.1.w.2,40;dLtmt, 197.3.w.l.5,28; s+dRtmt, 197.1.V.2: 3; s+dRtmt, 197.3.w.l.3,2;
s+dLtmt, 197.3.w.3(w), l;dLtmt, 197.3.w.l.3,27;sLtmt, 197.3.w.2,6;s+dRtmt, 197.1.W.2,
36+3; dL tmt, 197.3.w. 1.5, 27; sL tmt, 197.3.w. 1.8, 30. Layer 'w' is the basal layer in the site.
REFERRED MATERIAL: Fiji Museum Archaeology Department, 73 specimens: Part dL hum,
197.1.W.2, 18;sRhum, 197.1.V.2, l;ptdLhum, 197.1.X.2, 4; dL hum, 197.3.W.1.1, 10; pL
hum, 197.3.W.1.8, 8; L ulna, 197.3.W.1.4, 2; sR ulna, 197.1.X.2, 3; sL ulna, 197.3.V.1, 5; R
rad, 197.3.w.v.2, 10;Lrad, 197.3.W.1.6, 3; dR rad, 197.1.W.1, 5; sRrad, 197.3.W.1.8, 7; pR
rad, 197.3.W.1.7, 3; R rad, 197.3.W.1.3, 24; dR rad, 197.3.W.2, 5; dL rad, 197.1.W.2, 12; pL
rad, 197.1.V.2, 5; pR rad, 197.1.W.2, 9; R rad, 197.3.v.3(w), 7; pt R cmc, 197.1.W.2, 22; sR
cmc, 197.3.V.1, 8; d+sR cmc, 197.1.W.2, 7; sR cmc, 197.1.V.2, 21; sR cmc, 197.1.W.2, 14;
s+dL cmc, 197.3.W.1.8, 4; R cmc, 197.3.w.2(E), 18; pL cmc , 197.3.W.1.5, 2; pL cmc,
197.1.W.1, 13; sR cmc, 197.3.V.2, 1; L M2.1, 197.3.W.1.8; sL cor, 197.3.W.1.5, 3; sR cor,
197.3.W.1.7, 7; sR cor, 197.1.W.2, 4; pL cor, 197.3.W.1.1, 54; pR cor, 197.3.W.1.6; pR cor,
197.3.W.1.1, 15; pR cor, 197.3.W.2, 9; R cor, 197.3.W.1.7, 48+5; R scap, 197.3.W.1.1, 30; L
scap, 197.3.W.1.8,40; synsacrum, 197.3.w.2(E), 32; ant. sternum, 197.3.W.1.6, 119; pR fern,
197.1.w.l,8;dRfem, 197.1.v.l(6), 2; sRfem, 197.1.W.2, 15; Lfem, 197.1.V.1, l;p+sLfem,
197.3.W.1.1, l;pRfem, 197.3.W.1.5, l;dLfem, 197.3.W.1.3, l;p+sLfem, 197.1.v.l(c), 1;L
fem, 197.1.v.l,fl46, l;Rfem, 197.3.W.1.3, 25; dLtib, 197.1.W.1, 9; sRtib, 197.1.wBIT, 1;
dRtib, 197.3.W.1.7, 37; dLtib, 197.1.W.2, 6; dR tib, 197.3.W.2, 11; dLtib, 197.3.W.2, 2; dL
tib, 197.3.W.2, 13; dRtib, 197.3.W.2, 12;sRtib, 197.3.W.1.5, 2 1367; pR tib, 197.3.W.2, 7; sR
tib, 197.1.W.2, 5; sRtib, 197.3.T.6(E), 3; s+pLtib, 197.3.W.1.3, 26; s+pLtib, 197.3.W.1.4, 1;
L fibula, 197.3.w.2(E); phal 1.1, 197.3.V.1, 17; phal 1.1, 197.3.W.3, 6;phal 1.1, 197.3.W.1.6,
8; phal 1.1, 197.3.w.2(E), 7; phal 1.1, 197.1.W.2, 43; phal 1.1, 197.1.W.1, 2.
DESCRIPTION: The holotypic tarsometatarsus is stained reddish brown and is complete
except for the loss of the crista medialis hypotarsi plantar of the sulcus hypotarsi. It was
reassembled from two pieces. Unfortunately, during casting of the bone, the trochlea III was
damaged. In addition to the diagnostic features described above for the tarsometatarsus, the
fossa metatarsi I begins at 55% of total length from the proximal end; the fossa infracotylaris
dorsalis is deep and merges with the sulcus extensorius to extend distally to the mid length
point; the tuberositas m. tibialis cranialis is not prominent; the fossa parahypotarsalis
medialis extends to the/o.s.sa metatarsi I.
The femora (Fig. 8) are typical of Ducula, but are larger than in other species (Tables 8-
10). Only two complete femora and a single complete tarsometatarsus of Ducula lakeba are
known, but they suggest that this bird had relatively long tarsometatarsi (femur length 1.23
times tarsometatarsus length at most). In comparison, D. galeata has short tarsometatarsi
(femur length 1.42 times tarsometatarsus length), and all other pigeons have even shorter
tarsi (Table 9).
The tibiotarsi (Fig. 9) of Ducula lakeba share with other Ducula species the following
characters: the tuberosity for the proximal attachment of the retinaculum extensorium tibiotarsi
is at a distance from the condylus medialis equivalent to more than twice the height of that
condyle; the sulcus extensorius is bound by a prominent and sharp ridge laterally; there is a
flat area laterad of the pons supratendineus with no pneumatic foramen and no tuberosity for
the medial attachment of the retinaculum m. fibularis; and the distal width is greater than the
anteroposterior depth of the condyles. The tibiotarsus of D. lakeba is larger than that of D.
galeata or D. goliath (Table 10), the two largest extant species, and the tibiotarsus of D.
david is not known.
The humerus is represented only by small fragments that present no distinguishing
features other than the suggestion that the fossa m. brachialis is relatively deep. Fragments of
ulnae, radii, and carpometatcarpi (Fig. 10) are large versions of Ducula.
The coracoid (Fig. 10) referred to Ducula lakeba is similar to Ducula in that the medioventral
side of the humeral end of the shaft is rounded; the sulcus m. supracoracoideus is smooth and
shallow and little overhung by the proc. acrocoracoid (deep, overhung in Columba as seen in
Fig. 10) and lacks pneumatic foramina; the fades artic. sternalis is mediolaterally expanded
but dorsoventrally compressed; the impressio m. sternocoracoidei is deepest medially and
separated from the medial edge by a thin ridge. This coracoid has a greater shaft width (4.2
mm) than the paratype of D. David (3.1 x 3.3 mm) Balouet & Olson (1987).